|
The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission has
moved to formally recognize the landlocked Atlantic salmon in its Angler
Awards program. In the process, the Commission has established a
10.89-pound fish caught in Raystown Lake, Huntingdon County, as the first
state record in the new Atlantic salmon category.
The lunker salmon was landed Dec. 22, 1993 by Timothy A. Grace, of
Huntingdon. The fish which hit a daredevil spoon, measured 31 inches long
with a girth of 15 3/4 inches.
Although
there was no category for a state record Atlantic salmon at the time,
Grace filed a formal application with the Fish and Boat Commission
nonetheless. It turned out to be a wise decision; unbeknownst to Grace,
the Commission was already weighing the possibility of adding the species
to its Angler Recognition Program.
Mr.
Grace's application was timely in that we were already talking about
recognizing the Atlantic salmon. Nobody was sure if enough were being
caught to merit a new award slot. Then here comes this big fish - we went
from debating whether to establish an Atlantic salmon category to
discussing how and when to do it," said Dan Tredinnick, Angler Award
Coordinator.
According to Tredinnick, certifying Grace's catch took longer than usual.
"This was an odd situation in that rather than starting from scratch,
we opted to acknowledge an already documented catch. By doing so, we
wanted to set a high standard that ensured the continued quality of our
record program.
"In other words, we didn't feel it was appropriate to open up a new
category and possibly end up honoring a sub-par fish just because it was
the first one that came along. We knew right away Mr. Grace's fish was a
quality fish, but we weren't sure if it was actually the biggest Atlantic
salmon we knew about", he said.
So, the Commission reviewed its files to see if any fish had been
submitted for an Atlantic salmon record and if they were indeed bigger
than the Raystown catch. There was no documentation for a bigger member of
the species landed in Pennsylvania. "That's not to say bigger fish
haven't been taken here, It's possible that someone might have caught a
bigger one but not documented it since no record category existed."
acknowledged Tredinnick. "we'll review older catches, but they must
meet the same strict measuring criteria to which all record applications
adhere."
|